Important Info
> Resume
> Portfolio
> Wish List
Contribute:

News Sources
> Google News
> NY Times
> Work.com
> Slashdot
> Space.com
Blogs to Read
> blahblahblog
> Greek Tragedy
> Squirmelicious
> SML Pro Blog
> MYLIFE2LIVE
> Amy's Abroadblog
> My View of the World
> Long Tail
Links
> NY Apartments
> Seven Squared
> The Onion
eBay Auctions
> none at present

March 28, 2005

It Ain't Easy Being Geo-Green

I turned on NY 1 this morning to hear that the MTA has decided against buying more hydrogen-powered buses. The experient is over and gas won - a fleet of diesel powered buses is being purchased to replace the older buses being removed from service. That makes Thomas Friedman's column today in the NY Times even more important. Finally he's stopped talking about the Middle East and instead is talking about an even greater issue - the environment. He talks about implementing a "Geo-Green Strategy" for the US and this strategy is one that I wholeheartedly embrace and support. Here are the strategy's 3 main points:

1) We need a gasoline tax that would keep pump prices fixed at $4 a gallon, even if crude oil prices go down. At $4 a gallon (premium gasoline averages about $6 a gallon in Europe), we could change the car-buying habits of a large segment of the U.S. public, which would make it profitable for the car companies to convert more of their fleets to hybrid or ethanol engines, which over time could sharply reduce our oil consumption.

2) We need to start building nuclear power plants again. The new nuclear technology is safer and cleaner than ever. "The risks of climate change by continuing to rely on hydrocarbons are much greater than the risks of nuclear power," said Peter Schwartz, chairman of Global Business Network, a leading energy and strategy consulting firm. "Climate change is real and it poses a civilizational threat that [could] transform the carrying capacity of the entire planet."

3) And we need some kind of carbon tax that would move more industries from coal to wind, hydro and solar power, or other, cleaner fuels. The revenue from these taxes would go to pay down the deficit and the reduction in oil imports would help to strengthen the dollar and defuse competition for energy with China.

Heresy! $4 a gallon for gas?! MORE nuclear power plants?! Unfortunately, in a word, YES. In only 100 years, mankind has used up half of the world's oil supply by building the "modern" world. Our industrialized society, almost completely reliant on technology and computers nowadays, will come crashing down in the next 50 - 100 years unless we can come up with a cheaper and more efficient way of keeping it going. Using and abusing oil is not the way to do it. If you have a better idea, post a comment or let me know.

Posted by Jefe at 4:38 PM, filed under politics
Comments
Post a comment











Remember personal info?








Search


Recent Entries
Could it be?
Bail Out!
Rebooting The Muppets
Happy Birthday Emoticon
Foo News
An Advertisement About Nothing
David Foster Wallace, Dies at 46
O'Reilly interviews Obama
Who You Gonna Call?
7 Years Later



Archives
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
Syndicate this site (XML)
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.35