Important Info
> Resume
> Portfolio
> Wish List
Contribute:

News Sources
> Google News
> NY Times
> Work.com
> Slashdot
> Space.com
Blogs to Read
> blahblahblog
> Greek Tragedy
> Squirmelicious
> SML Pro Blog
> MYLIFE2LIVE
> Amy's Abroadblog
> My View of the World
> Long Tail
Links
> NY Apartments
> Seven Squared
> The Onion
eBay Auctions
> none at present

February 6, 2006

Music DNA

Pandora is a neat site run the people who set up the Music Genome Project. For those that haven't heard of this great idea, it captures the essence of music at the most fundamental level. Here is their spiel:

Hundreds of musical attributes or "genes" have been assembled into a very large Music Genome. Taken together these genes capture the unique and magical musical identity of a song - everything from melody, harmony and rhythm, to instrumentation, orchestration, arrangement, lyrics, and of course the rich world of singing and vocal harmony. It's not about what a band looks like, or what genre they supposedly belong to, or about who buys their records - it's about what each individual song sounds like. Over the past 5 years, they carefully listened to the songs of over 10,000 different artists - ranging from popular to obscure - and analyzed the musical qualities of each song one attribute at a time.
Based on a simple starting point, say "Jeff likes Led Zeppelin," Pandora serves up songs for your listening pleasure based on the genes that most closely identify with the chosen artist. For instance, "Cemetary Gates" by Pantera, one of my all-time favorite late 90s 104.3 FM songs, was played because it featured hard rock roots, mild rhythmic syncopation, minor key tonality, acoustic rhythm guitars and many other similarities identified in the music genome project. Based on user feedback (thumbs up, thumbs down), it further refines its suggestions until you are getting a steady diet of classics, recent classics and brand new songs and/or artists that you've never heard of that are just simply awesome.

I need some time to see how large the music database is because already I've heard some songs for the second time and I haven't been listening that long. However, right now I think its a much better version of Launch.com, which I stopped using after it was bought by Yahoo! because somehow my profile was deleted after the move. After weeks of saying "yes, no, yes, no, yes, yes, yes, no, etc" all of my effort was lost. For shame!

Via Jessie

Posted by Jefe at 4:47 PM, filed under music
Search


Recent Entries
David Foster Wallace, Dies at 46
O'Reilly interviews Obama
Who You Gonna Call?
7 Years Later
Anathem is Now At a Store Near You
Stop the Fiscal Insanity
Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed & Something Phish
The Cadavrick Needs to Work on His Microphone Placement
Pretty Mary Sunlight
A SpOOOnful of Sugar



Archives
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
Syndicate this site (XML)
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.35