Important Info
> Resume
> Portfolio
> Wish List
Contribute:

News Sources
> Google News
> NY Times
> Work.com
> Slashdot
> Space.com
Blogs to Read
> blahblahblog
> Greek Tragedy
> Squirmelicious
> SML Pro Blog
> MYLIFE2LIVE
> Amy's Abroadblog
> My View of the World
> Long Tail
Links
> NY Apartments
> Seven Squared
> The Onion
eBay Auctions
> none at present

May 25, 2006

More Green Versus Brown News

For all those potheads out there, WGTCTIP2 has some good news for you. To follow up on a post from a few months back about the long term effects of smoking marijuana, according to the findings of a new study at the University of California Los Angeles "that surprised even the researchers," marijuana smoking does not increase a person's risk of developing lung cancer. Smoking cigarettes however definitely does, so if you are currently smoking and you must smoke something, switch from the brown stuff to the green stuff immediately. Not only will your lungs be healthier, but your appetite will improve and marginally funny movies and television will become magically more amusing.

After the jump, feel free to read the Reuters report.

Via Phyl

Study finds no marijuana link to lung cancer

By Deena Beasley Tue May 23, 9:40 PM ET

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Marijuana smoking does not increase a person's risk of developing lung cancer, according to the findings of a new study at the University of California Los Angeles that surprised even the researchers.

They had expected to find that a history of heavy marijuana use, like cigarette smoking, would increase the risk of cancer.

Instead, the study, which compared the lifestyles of 611 Los Angeles County lung cancer patients and 601 patients with head and neck cancers with those of 1,040 people without cancer, found no elevated cancer risk for even the heaviest pot smokers. It did find a 20-fold increased risk of lung cancer in people who smoked two or more packs of cigarettes a day.

The study results were presented in San Diego on Tuesday at a meeting of the American Thoracic Society.

The study was confined to people under age 60 since baby boomers were the most likely age group to have long-term exposure to marijuana, said Dr. Donald Tashkin, senior researcher and professor at the UCLA School of Medicine.

The results should not be taken as a blank check to smoke pot, which has been associated with problems like cognitive impairment and chronic bronchitis, said Dr. John Hansen-Flaschen, chief of pulmonary and critical care at the University of Pennsylvania Health System in Philadelphia. He was not involved in the study.

Previous studies showed marijuana tar contained about 50 percent more of the chemicals linked to lung cancer, compared with tobacco tar, Tashkin said. In addition, smoking a marijuana joint deposits four times more tar in the lungs than smoking an equivalent amount of tobacco.

"Marijuana is packed more loosely than tobacco, so there's less filtration through the rod of the cigarette, so more particles will be inhaled," Tashkin said in a statement. "And marijuana smokers typically smoke differently than tobacco smokers -- they hold their breath about four times longer, allowing more time for extra fine particles to deposit in the lung."

He theorized that tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, a chemical in marijuana smoke that produces its psychotropic effect, may encourage aging, damaged cells to die off before they become cancerous.

Hansen-Flaschen also cautioned a cancer-marijuana link could emerge as baby boomers age and there may be smaller population groups, based on genetics or other factors, still at risk for marijuana-related cancers.

Posted by Jefe at 4:34 PM, filed under science
Comments
Post a comment











Remember personal info?








Search


Recent Entries
David Foster Wallace, Dies at 46
O'Reilly interviews Obama
Who You Gonna Call?
7 Years Later
Anathem is Now At a Store Near You
Stop the Fiscal Insanity
Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed & Something Phish
The Cadavrick Needs to Work on His Microphone Placement
Pretty Mary Sunlight
A SpOOOnful of Sugar



Archives
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
Syndicate this site (XML)
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.35