Important Info
> Resume
> Portfolio
> Wish List
Contribute:

News Sources
> Google News
> NY Times
> Work.com
> Slashdot
> Space.com
Blogs to Read
> blahblahblog
> Greek Tragedy
> Squirmelicious
> SML Pro Blog
> MYLIFE2LIVE
> Amy's Abroadblog
> My View of the World
> Long Tail
Links
> NY Apartments
> Seven Squared
> The Onion
eBay Auctions
> none at present

October 25, 2007

Salt Water As Fuel?

When John Kanzius of Erie, PA man announced he'd ignited salt water with the radio-frequency generator he'd invented, some thought it was a hoax. Not only is it not a hoax, scientists know why burns the way it does and he has been able to keep salt water in a test tube burning like a candle, as long as it is exposed to radio frequencies.

This leads me to think that the (to use the pun you know is coming) burning question is how can we use the world's most abundant substance as clean fuel? Or, more importantly, as my friend and former WGTCTIP2 author Erik puts it, "Does it take more energy to run the necessary storage equipment than the process generates?"

To continue, Erik wants to know why the article does not mention the obvious:

"Hydrogen fuel cells are totally possible, but the one hang-up is the current effort and cost to generate pure hydrogen needed to fuel them. Right now you'd need to capture it from a fossil fuel burning reaction, which obviously isn't ideal, and then store it at a gas station for people to fill up, making it a huge infrastructure challenge as well. With this machine, instead of burning the released hydrogen, capture it. We could all one day have these in our garages and use them to fuel our cars ourselves."

Below is a clip from the local news about this cancer fighter who accidentally lit salt water on fire and maybe in the process has saved mankind:

Via Neu

Posted by Jefe at 5:27 PM, filed under science
Comments

There are plenty of naysayers about what Kanzius has done on the Internet. I agree that this needs to be questioned, however, I am am seeing such venemous stuff on this guy. The simple truth is, we don't have enough information and I believe people are asking the wrong questions (partially kanzius fault). The question to ask is: Is this process more efficient then electrolysis for generating hydrogen? If so, then he is on to something. Lets start with that question. If there's more then that as far as returns go, that's great.

Posted by: Steve at October 30, 2007 7:02 PM
Post a comment











Remember personal info?








Search


Recent Entries
David Foster Wallace, Dies at 46
O'Reilly interviews Obama
Who You Gonna Call?
7 Years Later
Anathem is Now At a Store Near You
Stop the Fiscal Insanity
Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed & Something Phish
The Cadavrick Needs to Work on His Microphone Placement
Pretty Mary Sunlight
A SpOOOnful of Sugar



Archives
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
Syndicate this site (XML)
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.35